Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
6 pending office actions • 5 art units • 6 examiners • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 20 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 5 (83%) |
| No statute on record | 1 (17%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| TRAN, PHI DIEU | 1 | 65.6% | +22.4% |
| CERLANEK, RACHEL ELIZABETH | 1 | 96.4% | -1.8% |
| HANES JR., JOHN | 1 | 47.3% | +40.1% |
| FIGG, LAURA B | 1 | 57.3% | +23.7% |
| RAMSEY, JEREMY C | 1 | 52.3% | +46.8% |
| POWERS, WILLIAM S | 1 | 79.5% | +2.6% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18692568 | CONFIGURING AN ARCHITECTURAL COVERING GATEWAY PRIOR TO NETWORK CONNECTION | CERLANEK, RACHEL ELIZABETH | 55d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18478488 | OPERATING SYSTEMS AND RAIL ASSEMBLIES FOR COVERINGS FOR ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES AND RELATED COVERINGS | HANES JR., JOHN | 24d overdue |
| 18552130 | LAMINATE | FIGG, LAURA B | 17d overdue |
| 18031757 | CELLULAR SLATS FOR A COVERING FOR AN ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURE | RAMSEY, JEREMY C | 15d |
| 18755873 | PROTECTIVE CASE FOR A TRANSMISSION AND MOTOR(S) FOR AN ARCHITECTURAL-STRUCTURE COVERING | TRAN, PHI DIEU | 33d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3634 | 2 |
| 3633 | 1 |
| 2412 | 1 |
| 1781 | 1 |
| 2496 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18755873 | PROTECTIVE CASE FOR A TRANSMISSION AND MOTOR(S) FOR AN ARCHITECTURAL-STRUCTURE COVERING | TRAN, PHI DIEU | 3633 | Other | Non-Final OA | 33d | Pending | Jun 27, 2024 |
| 18692568 | CONFIGURING AN ARCHITECTURAL COVERING GATEWAY PRIOR TO NETWORK CONNECTION | CERLANEK, RACHEL ELIZABETH | 2412 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 55d | Pending | Mar 15, 2024 |
| 18478488 | OPERATING SYSTEMS AND RAIL ASSEMBLIES FOR COVERINGS FOR ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES AND RELATED COVERINGS | HANES JR., JOHN | 3634 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 24d overdue | Pending | Sep 29, 2023 |
| 18552130 | LAMINATE | FIGG, LAURA B | 1781 | §103 | Final Rejection | 17d overdue | Pending | Sep 22, 2023 |
| 18031757 | CELLULAR SLATS FOR A COVERING FOR AN ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURE | RAMSEY, JEREMY C | 3634 | §103 | Final Rejection | 15d | Pending | Apr 13, 2023 |
| 18245865 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EXECUTING A RESET MODE FOR ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURE COVERINGS | POWERS, WILLIAM S | 2496 | §103 | Final Rejection | 22d | Pending | Mar 17, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial