Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Hyuk Jun Kwon currently maintains 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This application is being processed through 1 distinct art unit, reflecting a focused technical scope for the current filing. The prosecution is overseen by 1 distinct examiner, which ensures a singular point of contact for the applicant during this stage of the process. This streamlined arrangement allows for a direct focus on the specific technical issues raised within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is EL-CHANTI, KARMA AHMAD, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. Given that the total number of pending actions is 1, this examiner is managing the full extent of the current active workload. This concentration within 1 art unit and under 1 examiner simplifies the administrative burden but also means the outcome of the portfolio is currently dependent on a single examiner's interpretation. Practitioners should tailor their arguments specifically to the feedback from this examiner, as there are no other pending matters to balance the prosecution strategy. The focus remains entirely on this single action within the designated art unit.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| EL-CHANTI, KARMA AHMAD | 1 | 37.4% | +28.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18935836 | MEDIATION SERVICE SYSTEM AND METHOD | EL-CHANTI, KARMA AHMAD | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18935836 | MEDIATION SERVICE SYSTEM AND METHOD | EL-CHANTI, KARMA AHMAD | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3629 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18935836 | MEDIATION SERVICE SYSTEM AND METHOD | EL-CHANTI, KARMA AHMAD | 3629 | §101§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Nov 04, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial