2 pending office actions • 0 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Hyzon Motors Usa Inc. is currently managing 2 pending office actions. These 2 pending office actions are distributed between 2 distinct examiners, which indicates that the company is dealing with different examination styles. The data shows 0 distinct art units for this portfolio, which may suggest that the 2 pending office actions are not yet fully classified within the standard art unit system. This 0 distinct art units figure indicates a lack of centralized art unit oversight for the current filings.
HAGOS, EYOB is the busiest examiner for the company, currently managing 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This 1 busiest examiner pending action is a component of the workload that requires attention. With 2 distinct examiners involved, the applicant must manage different prosecution styles simultaneously. Practitioners should prepare for varied feedback from the assigned officials, as the lack of a common art unit baseline may lead to varied outcomes across the 1 busiest examiner pending action handled by HAGOS, EYOB.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (50%) |
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| HAGOS, EYOB | 1 | 66.3% | +43.1% |
| LEE, JAMES | 1 | 74.2% | +19.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18613630 | ADAPTIVE STATE OF CHARGE CORRECTION AND ESTIMATION FOR A BATTERY PACK OF A FUEL CELL ELECTRIC VEHICLE | HAGOS, EYOB | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18613630 | ADAPTIVE STATE OF CHARGE CORRECTION AND ESTIMATION FOR A BATTERY PACK OF A FUEL CELL ELECTRIC VEHICLE | HAGOS, EYOB | — |
| 18495293 | MULTILAYER SOLID STATE ELECTROLYTE FOR ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES | LEE, JAMES | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18613630 | ADAPTIVE STATE OF CHARGE CORRECTION AND ESTIMATION FOR A BATTERY PACK OF A FUEL CELL ELECTRIC VEHICLE | HAGOS, EYOB | — | §101 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 22, 2024 |
| 18495293 | MULTILAYER SOLID STATE ELECTROLYTE FOR ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES | LEE, JAMES | — | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 26, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial