Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

I-Mab Biopharma US Limited

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

I-Mab Biopharma US Limited is currently managing 1 pending office action in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. This portfolio's active prosecution is limited to 1 distinct examiner, which simplifies the coordination of responses and legal strategy. The matter is being processed within 1 distinct art unit, ensuring that the technical review is handled by a specific group of specialists. This concentration of activity allows for a highly specialized approach to the company's intellectual property management.

CESARE, JOSEPH DAVID is identified as the busiest examiner, with 1 pending office action under review. This figure represents the total of 1 pending office action for the company, making this examiner the sole arbiter of the company's current patent applications. Such a concentrated workload allows the applicant to dedicate full attention to the specific procedural nuances of this single examiner. Navigating the requirements of this individual is the primary task for the company's prosecution team at this stage.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CESARE, JOSEPH DAVID 1 — —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1675 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18270472 FORMULATIONS OF ANTI-CD73 ANTIBODIES CESARE, JOSEPH DAVID 1675 §103Other Non-Final OA 8d overdue Pending Jun 29, 2023

Managing I-Mab Biopharma US Limited's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month