Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Networking & Security
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Ialyze LLC currently faces 1 pending office action in the Networking & Security technology area. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, ANDERSON II, JAMES M, and is located within 1 distinct art unit. The portfolio shows a focused prosecution state with no distribution across various examiners or units. This concentration means that the company's entire active presence in the Networking & Security sector is subject to the review of the assigned examiner. Practitioners should prepare for a focused interaction with the patent office, as the outcome of this matter will not be influenced by other concurrent applications.
ANDERSON II, JAMES M is the busiest examiner by default, holding the 1 pending office action. This relationship between the action, the examiner, and the art unit means the company's current prosecution strategy is entirely dependent on the interactions within this environment. Practitioners can focus resources on the specific preferences and past allowance rates of this individual. Understanding the nuances of the 1 distinct art unit is critical, as there are no other active matters to provide comparative data. The outcome of this 1 pending office action will set the tone for the company's future filings in the Networking & Security field.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Double-patenting + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ANDERSON II, JAMES M | 1 | 75.7% | +10.0% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18442020 | IMPAIRMENT ANALYSIS SYSTEMS AND RELATED METHODS | ANDERSON II, JAMES M | 52d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2425 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18442020 | IMPAIRMENT ANALYSIS SYSTEMS AND RELATED METHODS | ANDERSON II, JAMES M | 2425 | §112DP | Final Rejection | 52d overdue | Pending | Feb 14, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial