Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Ibusiness Funding LLC currently manages 2 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These matters are assigned to 1 distinct examiner. This concentration means that a single individual is responsible for all pending matters for the company.
The portfolio's current activity is localized within 1 distinct art unit. This indicates that the pending office actions are located in the same art unit and handled by the same examiner. MARY M GREGG is identified as the busiest examiner for the company. This examiner is responsible for 2 pending office actions.
The presence of a single distinct examiner and a single distinct art unit for the pending office actions suggests a highly centralized prosecution landscape. Practitioners must focus their strategy entirely on the requirements of the assigned official. The total pending workload for the company is defined by these interactions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems field. This centralization requires a deep understanding of the examiner's specific patentability standards.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (50%) |
| §101 + other | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| GREGG, MARY M | 2 | 14.0% | +14.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18817332 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI)-BASED REAL-TIME MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL OF USER ELECTRONIC ASSETS | GREGG, MARY M | 5d |
| 18389126 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AI-BASED LOAN PROCESSING | GREGG, MARY M | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18817332 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI)-BASED REAL-TIME MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL OF USER ELECTRONIC ASSETS | GREGG, MARY M | 5d |
| 18389126 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AI-BASED LOAN PROCESSING | GREGG, MARY M | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3695 | 2 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18817332 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI)-BASED REAL-TIME MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL OF USER ELECTRONIC ASSETS | GREGG, MARY M | 3695 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | 5d | Pending | Aug 28, 2024 |
| 18389126 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AI-BASED LOAN PROCESSING | GREGG, MARY M | 3695 | §101 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Nov 13, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial