Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Ichikawa Co. Ltd.

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

3 pending office actions • 1 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Ichikawa Co. Ltd. is managing 2 pending office actions in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These 2 actions are assigned to 2 distinct examiners, yet they are both within 1 distinct art unit. This structure suggests that while the company is interacting with different individuals, the technical review is centralized within a single administrative division. This arrangement allows the applicant to focus on the specific examination guidelines of 1 unit.

ADHLAKHA, RITA P is the busiest examiner for the company, responsible for the 1 busiest examiner pending action. With 2 pending office actions and 2 distinct examiners in 1 distinct art unit, the applicant can look for consistency in the unit's approach to chemistry and materials. The prosecution strategy should account for the individual styles of the examiners while adhering to the overarching standards of the art unit. Practitioners can leverage this centralized oversight to ensure that arguments presented to ADHLAKHA, RITA P are consistent with the technical expectations of the broader administrative group. This structure may lead to more predictable outcomes, as the shared environment of the art unit often results in a unified perspective on technical issues and prior art interpretation.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
1
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
33% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
2
Business / Other
67% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ADHLAKHA, RITA P 1 75.6% +17.2%
MINSKEY, JACOB T 1 69.3% +33.1%
RUSSELL, STEPHEN MATTHEW 1 63.6% +34.4%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18718842 BASE FABRIC FOR PAPERMAKING FELT AND PAPERMAKING FELT MADE BY JOINTING SAME ADHLAKHA, RITA P —
18938477 PAPERMAKING FELT BASE MEMBER AND PAPERMAKING FELT MINSKEY, JACOB T —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18627471 BASE FABRIC FOR PAPERMAKING FELT, PAPERMAKING FELT, AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING PAPERMAKING FELT RUSSELL, STEPHEN MATTHEW 7d
18718842 BASE FABRIC FOR PAPERMAKING FELT AND PAPERMAKING FELT MADE BY JOINTING SAME ADHLAKHA, RITA P —
18938477 PAPERMAKING FELT BASE MEMBER AND PAPERMAKING FELT MINSKEY, JACOB T —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1748 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18718842 BASE FABRIC FOR PAPERMAKING FELT AND PAPERMAKING FELT MADE BY JOINTING SAME ADHLAKHA, RITA P — §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 03, 2025
18938477 PAPERMAKING FELT BASE MEMBER AND PAPERMAKING FELT MINSKEY, JACOB T — §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 06, 2024
18627471 BASE FABRIC FOR PAPERMAKING FELT, PAPERMAKING FELT, AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING PAPERMAKING FELT RUSSELL, STEPHEN MATTHEW 1748 §103 Non-Final OA 7d Pending Apr 05, 2024

Managing Ichikawa Co. Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month