Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Icm Airport Technics Pty Ltd. currently manages 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, MOLNAR, HUNTER A, who serves as the busiest examiner for the portfolio. The prosecution of this case is situated within 1 distinct art unit, representing a focused area for the company's current patent activities.
The presence of the pending office action across the distinct art unit suggests a specific or early-stage patent portfolio. MOLNAR, HUNTER A is the examiner responsible for the company's pending workload, where they hold 1 pending action. This concentration in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems area indicates that the company's intellectual property efforts are currently limited to the technical challenges reflected in the 1 pending office action. With the distinct examiner and the distinct art unit involved, the company's current prosecution experience is centralized. This focus requires a high degree of precision in addressing the specific requirements of the assigned examiner.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MOLNAR, HUNTER A | 1 | 50.6% | +33.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19216444 | OFFLINE DEPARTURE CONTROL SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SELF-SERVICE PASSENGER TERMINALS | MOLNAR, HUNTER A | 13d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19216444 | OFFLINE DEPARTURE CONTROL SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SELF-SERVICE PASSENGER TERMINALS | MOLNAR, HUNTER A | 13d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3628 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19216444 | OFFLINE DEPARTURE CONTROL SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SELF-SERVICE PASSENGER TERMINALS | MOLNAR, HUNTER A | 3628 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | 13d | Pending | May 22, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial