Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Icon Clinical Research Limited

Technology area: Computing & Software

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Icon Clinical Research Limited currently faces 3 pending office actions within the Computing & Software technology area. These actions are distributed across 3 distinct examiners, suggesting a range of technical examinations despite the shared technology category. The workload spans 2 distinct art units, which indicates that the portfolio's software innovations may touch upon different functional classifications within the patent office. This distribution across 2 art units requires the company to monitor different examination trends simultaneously. Legal teams should coordinate their responses to ensure technical consistency across these different units.

The busiest examiner, MIAN, MUHAMMAD U, is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This distribution across 3 distinct examiners requires a multi-faceted approach to prosecution. Practitioners must prepare unique strategies for each of the 3 pending office actions to account for the different perspectives of the examiners involved. The company's strategy in the computing sector is currently divided among these separate examiner interactions. This approach ensures that examiner decisions are distributed across the pending software portfolio.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (33%)
§103 only1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
2
Information Tech
67% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
33% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MIAN, MUHAMMAD U 1 67.1% +22.4%
KELLS, ASHER 1 78.9% +11.6%
OBISESAN, AUGUSTINE KUNLE 1 63.6% +20.8%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18680095 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR UTILIZING DATA OBJECT REFERENCES TO ACCESS A TRANSLATED VERSION OF A VALIDATED INSTRUMENT MIAN, MUHAMMAD U —
18680113 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DIRECT INTEGRATION OF A PREVIEW FUNCTION KELLS, ASHER —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18680095 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR UTILIZING DATA OBJECT REFERENCES TO ACCESS A TRANSLATED VERSION OF A VALIDATED INSTRUMENT MIAN, MUHAMMAD U —
18680113 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DIRECT INTEGRATION OF A PREVIEW FUNCTION KELLS, ASHER —
18678419 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPLEMENTING DRUG MECHANISMS OF ACTION WITH MACHINE LEARNING OBISESAN, AUGUSTINE KUNLE —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2163 1
2171 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18680095 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR UTILIZING DATA OBJECT REFERENCES TO ACCESS A TRANSLATED VERSION OF A VALIDATED INSTRUMENT MIAN, MUHAMMAD U 2163 §101§112 Final Rejection — Pending May 31, 2024
18680113 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DIRECT INTEGRATION OF A PREVIEW FUNCTION KELLS, ASHER 2171 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 31, 2024
18678419 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPLEMENTING DRUG MECHANISMS OF ACTION WITH MACHINE LEARNING OBISESAN, AUGUSTINE KUNLE — §103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 30, 2024

Managing Icon Clinical Research Limited's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month