Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Ideavillage Products Corp. maintains a patent portfolio in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The portfolio currently has 2 pending office actions. Both of these actions are assigned to 1 distinct examiner, ELIZABETH MARY COLE IMANI, who is the busiest examiner for the portfolio with 2 pending office actions.
The prosecution is concentrated within 1 distinct art unit. This indicates that the 2 pending office actions are being reviewed by the same examiner within a single technical division of the USPTO. ELIZABETH MARY COLE IMANI is responsible for the entirety of the portfolio's current pending workload in the Chemistry & Materials field.
With 2 pending office actions and only 1 distinct examiner, the prosecution experience is highly centralized. ELIZABETH MARY COLE IMANI's handling of 2 pending actions within 1 distinct art unit suggests a consistent examination approach for the company's current filings. This concentration allows for a unified prosecution strategy across the pending matters. Practitioners can focus their efforts on the specific preferences of this single examiner within the Chemistry & Materials sector.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 2 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| IMANI, ELIZABETH MARY COLE | 2 | 33.5% | +25.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19004729 | FAR INFRARED RADIATION NANOFIBER YARN COMPOSITION | IMANI, ELIZABETH MARY COLE | — |
| 18808850 | FAR INFRARED RADIATION NANOFIBER YARN COMPOSITION | IMANI, ELIZABETH MARY COLE | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19004729 | FAR INFRARED RADIATION NANOFIBER YARN COMPOSITION | IMANI, ELIZABETH MARY COLE | — |
| 18808850 | FAR INFRARED RADIATION NANOFIBER YARN COMPOSITION | IMANI, ELIZABETH MARY COLE | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1789 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19004729 | FAR INFRARED RADIATION NANOFIBER YARN COMPOSITION | IMANI, ELIZABETH MARY COLE | 1789 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 30, 2024 |
| 18808850 | FAR INFRARED RADIATION NANOFIBER YARN COMPOSITION | IMANI, ELIZABETH MARY COLE | — | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 19, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial