Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Networking & Security
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days
Idis Co. Ltd. currently manages 1 pending office action within the Networking & Security technology area. This case is situated in 1 distinct art unit, which represents the entire technical footprint for the company's current filings. The prosecution involves a unique examiner, meaning the company's pending workload is subject to the review of a single individual rather than a larger group of officials.
YENKE, BRIAN P is identified as the busiest examiner for this portfolio, currently handling the pending action. Because there is only a single pending office action in the entire portfolio, this examiner's specific preferences and past decisions will be the primary factor in the company's immediate prosecution outcomes. Practitioners should focus on the specific procedural requirements of the art unit, as it represents the full scope of the company's current interaction with the patent office. This concentrated footprint suggests a very specific set of innovations currently under review in the Networking & Security sector, where the count of pending actions is equal to the count of distinct examiners assigned to the portfolio.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| YENKE, BRIAN P | 1 | 63.3% | +13.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19284711 | PTZ DRIVE APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CAMERA | YENKE, BRIAN P | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19284711 | PTZ DRIVE APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CAMERA | YENKE, BRIAN P | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2422 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19284711 | PTZ DRIVE APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CAMERA | YENKE, BRIAN P | 2422 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 30, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial