Technology area: Computing & Software
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Igel Technology GmbH has a focused prosecution profile with 1 pending office action in the Computing & Software technology area. This single action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, PANDEY, KESHAB R, who is the busiest examiner for the company. This means that the company's entire current effort to secure patent rights is dependent on this one examiner's evaluation. The use of 1 distinct art unit for the 1 pending office action further highlights the scope of the company's current activity.
PANDEY, KESHAB R is responsible for 1 pending office action, which accounts for all of the company's active prosecution. In the computing and software sector, such a concentrated profile suggests a specific technological focus, where the outcome of this 1 matter is the primary factor in the company's immediate IP success. The alignment of 1 distinct examiner with 1 distinct art unit indicates that the company is not currently facing a diverse range of examination styles.
By focusing resources on the 1 pending office action, the company can maintain oversight on its intellectual property development. The outcome of this matter is the primary factor in the company's immediate success in the US patent system. This concentrated profile in 1 distinct art unit suggests a specific technological niche for the company's current filings. PANDEY, KESHAB R handles the busiest_examiner_pending count of 1 for the portfolio.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PANDEY, KESHAB R | 1 | 88.0% | +8.0% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19000443 | Configuration of End User Devices | PANDEY, KESHAB R | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2176 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19000443 | Configuration of End User Devices | PANDEY, KESHAB R | 2176 | §103Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 23, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialIgel Technology GmbH has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Keshab R Pandey has the most, with 1 of Igel Technology GmbH's pending office actions.
Mostly Computing & Software (USPTO Tech Center 2100), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
