Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Illimitec AB is currently navigating 1 pending office action within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This single matter represents the company's entire active presence before the USPTO. The case is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, which simplifies the communication and negotiation process for the applicant.
The prosecution is occurring within 1 distinct art unit. This indicates that the technology is classified within a specific mechanical or medical specialty. Because the portfolio is limited to 1 distinct art unit, the practitioner can focus on a consistent set of examination guidelines and prior art in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering field.
PARK, JE HWAN JOHN is the busiest examiner for the portfolio. This individual is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending action. As the sole examiner involved, PARK, JE HWAN JOHN will have a decisive impact on the outcome of the company's current patent efforts. Understanding the specific preferences of this examiner is essential.
With 1 busiest examiner pending action, the prosecution environment is highly streamlined. The practitioner can dedicate full attention to the specific concerns of the assigned examiner. This focused approach is ideal for resolving rejections and advancing the application toward allowance.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PARK, JE HWAN JOHN | 1 | 0.0% | +0.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18281728 | Device for Beverage Making | PARK, JE HWAN JOHN | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3761 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18281728 | Device for Beverage Making | PARK, JE HWAN JOHN | 3761 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 12, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialIllimitec AB has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Je Hwan John Park has the most, with 1 of Illimitec AB's pending office actions.
Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
