Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

IMBA - Institut für Molekulare Biotechnologie GmbH

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

IMBA - Institut für Molekulare Biotechnologie GmbH currently has 3 pending office actions within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. These active matters are distributed across 3 distinct art units and involve 3 distinct examiners. This distribution indicates a diversified prosecution strategy where the company is simultaneously advancing multiple technical projects or different aspects of a complex technology. The involvement of 3 separate art units suggests that the company's innovations span several specialized classifications within the biotechnology sector, requiring a broad management approach to handle different technical standards.

ZANNA MARIA BEHARRY is the busiest examiner, although they are responsible for only 1 pending office action. Because each of the 3 pending office actions is assigned to a different examiner, the company must navigate unique examination styles and sets of procedural requirements for every case. This lack of examiner overlap means that the outcomes in one matter may not necessarily predict the results in others, even within the same technology area. Practitioners must coordinate responses across 3 distinct examiners to ensure consistency in the company's overall intellectual property strategy while addressing the specific concerns of each individual official. This level of distribution across 3 distinct art units requires careful monitoring of diverse patent office requirements.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
1
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (33%)
Double-patenting + other1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BEHARRY, ZANNA MARIA 1 24.7% +56.4%
MARTIN, PAUL C 1 41.8% +21.6%
WANG, CHANG YU 1 33.5% +53.5%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18260418 BLASTOCYST-LIKE CELL AGGREGATE AND METHODS MARTIN, PAUL C 7d
18558243 CONTROLLED GENE EXPRESSION METHODS AND MEANS BEHARRY, ZANNA MARIA —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18260418 BLASTOCYST-LIKE CELL AGGREGATE AND METHODS MARTIN, PAUL C 7d
18558243 CONTROLLED GENE EXPRESSION METHODS AND MEANS BEHARRY, ZANNA MARIA —
16608719 BI- OR MULTI-DIFFERENTIATED ORGANOID WANG, CHANG YU —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1632 1
1653 1
1675 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18558243 CONTROLLED GENE EXPRESSION METHODS AND MEANS BEHARRY, ZANNA MARIA 1632 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 31, 2023
18260418 BLASTOCYST-LIKE CELL AGGREGATE AND METHODS MARTIN, PAUL C 1653 §103§112 Non-Final OA 7d Pending Jul 05, 2023
16608719 BI- OR MULTI-DIFFERENTIATED ORGANOID WANG, CHANG YU 1675 §103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 25, 2019

Managing IMBA - Institut für Molekulare Biotechnologie GmbH's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month