Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Immatics Biotechnologies GmbH

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

10 pending office actions • 7 art units • 10 examiners • 0 of 10 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Immatics Biotechnologies GmbH maintains a company patent portfolio in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area, currently featuring 10 pending office actions. These actions are distributed among 10 distinct examiners, which means that every pending matter is being handled by a different individual. This high degree of examiner diversity suggests a broad range of perspectives on the company's patent applications. The portfolio's prosecution is spread across 7 distinct art units.

OUSPENSKI, ILIA I is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, though this examiner is only responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This reflects the distribution of the 10 pending office actions across the 10 distinct examiners. The involvement of 7 distinct art units indicates that the company's biotechnology and pharmaceutical innovations are categorized into several specialized sub-fields at the patent office. OUSPENSKI, ILIA I is among the ten officials currently reviewing the company's work.

With 10 distinct examiners and 7 distinct art units, the prosecution strategy for Immatics Biotechnologies GmbH must be individualized for each application. There is no single examiner who holds significant influence over the portfolio's overall progress. Practitioners must navigate the specific tendencies of 10 different examiners across 7 different art units, requiring a versatile approach to the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals landscape. The 10 pending office actions represent a wide-reaching engagement with the patent office.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

10
Total Pending OAs
9
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (10%)
3
Medium (30%)
4
Easy (40%)
2
Unknown (20%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (10%)
§112 only3 (30%)
Double-patenting only1 (10%)
Double-patenting + other3 (30%)
No statute on record2 (20%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

7
Life Sciences
70% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
3
Business / Other
30% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

100 h
Manual time on pending OAs
20 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
35 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.9 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
OUSPENSKI, ILIA I 1 77.5% +20.4%
SANG, HONG 1 55.0% +62.4%
ESSEX, LAURA ANN 1 60.5% +35.2%
REDDIG, PETER J 1 57.9% +40.2%
CANELLA, KAREN A 1 62.2% +32.8%
SKELDING, ZACHARY S 1 59.7% +41.2%
YOUTCHOM PENDIE, EMMANUEL LED 1 66.7% +40.0%
MOSELEY II, NELSON B 1 68.0% +41.5%
FONTAINHAS, AURORA M 1 37.9% +49.2%
DUFFY, BRADLEY 1 54.5% +45.8%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18178055 PERSONALIZED IMMUNOTHERAPY AGAINST SEVERAL NEURONAL AND BRAIN TUMORS FONTAINHAS, AURORA M 153d overdue

Interview Candidates (10)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18178055 PERSONALIZED IMMUNOTHERAPY AGAINST SEVERAL NEURONAL AND BRAIN TUMORS FONTAINHAS, AURORA M 153d overdue
18315183 NOVEL PEPTIDES AND COMBINATION OF PEPTIDES FOR USE IN IMMUNOTHERAPY AGAINST VARIOUS TUMORS MOSELEY II, NELSON B 27d
18323577 NOVEL PEPTIDES AND COMBINATION OF PEPTIDES FOR USE IN IMMUNOTHERAPY AGAINST VARIOUS CANCERS YOUTCHOM PENDIE, EMMANUEL LED 34d
18647837 NOVEL PEPTIDES AND COMBINATION OF PEPTIDES FOR USE IN IMMUNOTHERAPY AGAINST VARIOUS TUMORS OUSPENSKI, ILIA I —
18533733 PEPTIDES AND COMBINATION OF PEPTIDES FOR USE IN IMMUNOTHERAPY AGAINST NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER AND OTHER CANCERS SANG, HONG —
18529656 AMIDATED PEPTIDES AND THEIR DEAMIDATED COUNTERPARTS DISPLAYED BY NON-HLA-A*02 FOR USE IN IMMUNOTHERAPY AGAINST DIFFERENT TYPES OF CANCERS ESSEX, LAURA ANN —
18505361 METHODS OF IDENTIFYING METASTATIC LESIONS IN A PATIENT AND TREATING THEREOF REDDIG, PETER J —
18345700 PEPTIDES, COMBINATION OF PEPTIDES, AND CELL BASED MEDICAMENTS FOR USE IN IMMUNOTHERAPY AGAINST URINARY BLADDER CANCER AND OTHER CANCERS CANELLA, KAREN A —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1649 1
1646 1
1644 1
1647 1
1642 1
1675 1
1643 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18647837 NOVEL PEPTIDES AND COMBINATION OF PEPTIDES FOR USE IN IMMUNOTHERAPY AGAINST VARIOUS TUMORS OUSPENSKI, ILIA I — §112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 26, 2024
18533733 PEPTIDES AND COMBINATION OF PEPTIDES FOR USE IN IMMUNOTHERAPY AGAINST NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER AND OTHER CANCERS SANG, HONG — §102§103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 08, 2023
18529656 AMIDATED PEPTIDES AND THEIR DEAMIDATED COUNTERPARTS DISPLAYED BY NON-HLA-A*02 FOR USE IN IMMUNOTHERAPY AGAINST DIFFERENT TYPES OF CANCERS ESSEX, LAURA ANN 1649 §112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 05, 2023
18505361 METHODS OF IDENTIFYING METASTATIC LESIONS IN A PATIENT AND TREATING THEREOF REDDIG, PETER J 1646 §103DP Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 09, 2023
18345700 PEPTIDES, COMBINATION OF PEPTIDES, AND CELL BASED MEDICAMENTS FOR USE IN IMMUNOTHERAPY AGAINST URINARY BLADDER CANCER AND OTHER CANCERS CANELLA, KAREN A — §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 30, 2023
18343502 TRANSFECTED T-CELLS AND T-CELL RECEPTORS FOR USE IN IMMUNOTHERAPY AGAINST CANCERS SKELDING, ZACHARY S 1644 §112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 28, 2023
18323577 NOVEL PEPTIDES AND COMBINATION OF PEPTIDES FOR USE IN IMMUNOTHERAPY AGAINST VARIOUS CANCERS YOUTCHOM PENDIE, EMMANUEL LED 1647 Other Non-Final OA 34d Pending May 25, 2023
18315183 NOVEL PEPTIDES AND COMBINATION OF PEPTIDES FOR USE IN IMMUNOTHERAPY AGAINST VARIOUS TUMORS MOSELEY II, NELSON B 1642 Other Non-Final OA 27d Pending May 10, 2023
18178055 PERSONALIZED IMMUNOTHERAPY AGAINST SEVERAL NEURONAL AND BRAIN TUMORS FONTAINHAS, AURORA M 1675 §101Other Non-Final OA 153d overdue Pending Mar 03, 2023
18052009 RECRUITING AGENT FURTHER BINDING AN MHC MOLECULE DUFFY, BRADLEY 1643 DP Final Rejection — Pending Nov 02, 2022

Managing Immatics Biotechnologies GmbH's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month