Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Immervision Inc.

Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics

2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Immervision Inc. maintains 2 pending office actions within the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. These 2 pending office actions are being handled by 2 distinct examiners, ensuring that each pending matter is receiving an independent review. Both of these examiners are operating within 1 distinct art unit, which indicates a high degree of technical focus for the company's current patent filings.

NATASHA NIGAM is designated as the busiest examiner for this portfolio, with 1 pending office action under her review. Because there are 2 pending office actions and 2 distinct examiners, the workload is perfectly balanced between them. The concentration of all prosecution activity within 1 distinct art unit suggests that the company's optics and semiconductor innovations are being evaluated against a singular set of departmental guidelines and prior art databases.

The presence of 2 distinct examiners within a single art unit allows for a comparison of how different individuals in the same department interpret the company's technology. Since NATASHA NIGAM and the other examiner each have 1 pending office action, no single examiner has more influence than the other. However, the unified focus on 1 distinct art unit means that the company's overall prosecution success is heavily tied to the specific culture and precedents of that one administrative group.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (50%)
1
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
2
Semiconductors
100% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
NIGAM, NATASHA 1 54.3% +20.7%
HUSTOFT, JUSTIN WAYNE 1 65.0% +19.9%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18125230 METHOD TO DESIGN OPTICAL SYSTEMS USING METALENS ELEMENTS FOR DISTORTION CONTROL NIGAM, NATASHA —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18125230 METHOD TO DESIGN OPTICAL SYSTEMS USING METALENS ELEMENTS FOR DISTORTION CONTROL NIGAM, NATASHA —
17159648 HIGH RESOLUTION MINIATURE WIDE-ANGLE LENS HUSTOFT, JUSTIN WAYNE —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2872 2

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18125230 METHOD TO DESIGN OPTICAL SYSTEMS USING METALENS ELEMENTS FOR DISTORTION CONTROL NIGAM, NATASHA 2872 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 23, 2023
17159648 HIGH RESOLUTION MINIATURE WIDE-ANGLE LENS HUSTOFT, JUSTIN WAYNE 2872 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 27, 2021

Managing Immervision Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Immervision Inc. have?

Immervision Inc. has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Immervision Inc. applications?

Natasha Nigam has the most, with 1 of Immervision Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Immervision Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics (USPTO Tech Center 2800), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month