Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Immervision Inc.

Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Immervision Inc. has 1 pending office action in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. This matter is being reviewed by a distinct examiner within a distinct art unit. The current prosecution activity is highly concentrated, reflecting a specific focus on optical or circuit technologies. This singular focus allows for a very precise application of legal and technical resources. The company can ensure that its arguments are perfectly aligned with the requirements of the distinct art unit.

HUSTOFT, JUSTIN WAYNE is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, managing 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This individual is the sole examiner currently interacting with the company's pending applications. Practitioners should focus their efforts on the specific procedural and technical expectations of this examiner within the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics field. The involvement of a distinct art unit suggests a streamlined administrative process for this portfolio. Success will depend on a thorough understanding of this examiner's approach to optics and circuit claims.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
100% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HUSTOFT, JUSTIN WAYNE 1 67.0% +21.9%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17159648 HIGH RESOLUTION MINIATURE WIDE-ANGLE LENS HUSTOFT, JUSTIN WAYNE —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2872 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
17159648 HIGH RESOLUTION MINIATURE WIDE-ANGLE LENS HUSTOFT, JUSTIN WAYNE 2872 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 27, 2021

Managing Immervision Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month