Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Imx Inc. currently has 1 pending office action in its patent portfolio. This filing is located within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The prosecution involves 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, showing a specific focus for the company's current active matter.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio is EBERSMAN, BRUCE I, who is assigned 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This assignment accounts for the total volume of pending office actions currently active for the company. The alignment of the 1 examiner and the 1 art unit for the pending action indicates a streamlined examination process within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector.
With the current prosecution concentrated under EBERSMAN, BRUCE I, the examiner serves as the primary point of contact for the portfolio. The data reflects a structure where the workload is not distributed across multiple technical groups. This concentration simplifies the communication path between the applicant and the patent office for the existing filing. Practitioners can expect a singular point of review for the subject matter in this technology area.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| EBERSMAN, BRUCE I | 1 | 64.1% | +58.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18865200 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING FINANCIAL INDEXES FOR MEDICAL CONDITIONS | EBERSMAN, BRUCE I | 79d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18865200 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING FINANCIAL INDEXES FOR MEDICAL CONDITIONS | EBERSMAN, BRUCE I | 79d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3693 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18865200 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING FINANCIAL INDEXES FOR MEDICAL CONDITIONS | EBERSMAN, BRUCE I | 3693 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | 79d overdue | Pending | Nov 12, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial