Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Inait SA

Technology area: Computing & Software

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Inait SA is currently managing 3 pending office actions in the Computing & Software technology area. These actions are distributed among 3 distinct examiners, which prevents a concentration of workload with any single official. Despite the number of examiners, the matters are contained within 2 distinct art units, suggesting some technical overlap in the software components being patented. This distribution requires the legal team to coordinate technical arguments that may be relevant across different examination groups.

The busiest examiner, ACOSTA, RILEY SULLIVAN, is responsible for 1 pending office action. This indicates an even distribution of the 3 total pending actions across the 3 examiners involved. With 1 busiest examiner pending action, the company must navigate the distinct requirements of multiple officials simultaneously. This distribution requires a versatile prosecution approach that addresses the specific nuances of the 2 art units involved in the review process. Practitioners should monitor the 3 distinct examiners to identify any diverging trends in how the computing technology is being evaluated.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (33%)
§103 only1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
3
Information Tech
100% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ACOSTA, RILEY SULLIVAN 1 100.0% +0.0%
VAUGHN, RYAN C 1 61.9% +17.2%
HWANG, MEGAN ELIZABETH 1 55.9% +58.6%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18611781 ENCODING AND DECODING INFORMATION ACOSTA, RILEY SULLIVAN —
17783978 CONSTRUCTING AND OPERATING AN ARTIFICIAL RECURRENT NEURAL NETWORK VAUGHN, RYAN C —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17783978 CONSTRUCTING AND OPERATING AN ARTIFICIAL RECURRENT NEURAL NETWORK VAUGHN, RYAN C —
17783976 CONSTRUCTING AND OPERATING AN ARTIFICIAL RECURRENT NEURAL NETWORK HWANG, MEGAN ELIZABETH —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2143 2
2125 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18611781 ENCODING AND DECODING INFORMATION ACOSTA, RILEY SULLIVAN 2143 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 21, 2024
17783978 CONSTRUCTING AND OPERATING AN ARTIFICIAL RECURRENT NEURAL NETWORK VAUGHN, RYAN C 2125 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 09, 2022
17783976 CONSTRUCTING AND OPERATING AN ARTIFICIAL RECURRENT NEURAL NETWORK HWANG, MEGAN ELIZABETH 2143 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 09, 2022

Managing Inait SA's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Inait SA have?

Inait SA has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Inait SA applications?

Riley Sullivan Acosta has the most, with 1 of Inait SA's pending office actions.

What technology area are Inait SA's patent applications in?

Mostly Computing & Software (USPTO Tech Center 2100), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month