Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Indian Institute Of Technology Delhi

4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 7 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
3
Medium (75%)
1
Easy (25%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (50%)
§102 only1 (25%)
§112 only1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
25% of docket
1
Information Tech
25% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HASKE, WOJCIECH 1 72.8% +17.9%
EDRADA, ISABELLA AMEYALI 1 75.0% +100.0%
MCBETH, WILLIAM C 1 66.9% +57.6%
BATES, DAVID W 1 76.2% +17.0%

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18520583 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR VERIFYING NAVIGATION SIGNALS EDRADA, ISABELLA AMEYALI 147d overdue
17294216 ORTHOPEDIC SCREW BATES, DAVID W 19d
18870695 REGENERABLE ANODIZED POROUS ALUMINA DEVICE AND A METHOD OF FABRICATION THEREOF HASKE, WOJCIECH 34d
18472485 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ENABLING A MULTI-OPERATOR EDGE ENVIRONMENT MCBETH, WILLIAM C 79d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1794 1
3648 1
2449 1
3799 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18870695 REGENERABLE ANODIZED POROUS ALUMINA DEVICE AND A METHOD OF FABRICATION THEREOF HASKE, WOJCIECH 1794 §102 Final Rejection 34d Pending Dec 02, 2024
18520583 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR VERIFYING NAVIGATION SIGNALS EDRADA, ISABELLA AMEYALI 3648 §112 Non-Final OA 147d overdue Pending Nov 28, 2023
18472485 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ENABLING A MULTI-OPERATOR EDGE ENVIRONMENT MCBETH, WILLIAM C 2449 §103 Final Rejection 79d Pending Sep 22, 2023
17294216 ORTHOPEDIC SCREW BATES, DAVID W 3799 §103 Non-Final OA 19d Pending May 14, 2021

Managing Indian Institute Of Technology Delhi's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month