Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Indizen Optical Technologies S L is currently managing 1 pending office action within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This specific action is being handled by ARIELLA MACHNESS, who is identified as the busiest examiner for the company. The prosecution of this portfolio is highly concentrated, involving only the distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit.
The presence of the pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials sector suggests a very focused intellectual property strategy. Because the workload is limited to the specific art unit, the company is interacting with a technical niche within the patent office. The outcome of this prosecution depends entirely on the review by ARIELLA MACHNESS, as there are no other examiners currently assigned to the company's pending matters.
For practitioners, this profile indicates that the company's immediate patent success is tied to the point of contact. With the current examiner and art unit involved, there is no internal data to compare examiner behavior or art unit trends within this portfolio. The focus remains on addressing the requirements of the Chemistry & Materials division through the pending office action currently on record.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Double-patenting + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MACHNESS, ARIELLA | 1 | 61.5% | +27.4% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19172603 | EYEWEAR LENS CREATION USING ADDITIVE TECHNIQUES WITH DIFFUSE LIGHT | MACHNESS, ARIELLA | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1743 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19172603 | EYEWEAR LENS CREATION USING ADDITIVE TECHNIQUES WITH DIFFUSE LIGHT | MACHNESS, ARIELLA | 1743 | §103DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 07, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialIndizen Optical Technologies S L has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Ariella Machness has the most, with 1 of Indizen Optical Technologies S L's pending office actions.
Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
