Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Indorama Ventures Mobility Obernburg GmbH has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The prosecution is concentrated under 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This indicates a very specific technical focus for the company's current patenting efforts. The use of 1 distinct art unit ensures that the prosecution remains within a single administrative framework, which can lead to more consistent results.
GRABER, MARIA EILEEN is the busiest examiner, responsible for the 1 pending office action. With 1 distinct examiner involved, the company's immediate outcomes are tied to the specific examination patterns of a single person. This concentration simplifies the management of the portfolio as there is 1 pending office action to track. The alignment of the examiner and the art unit suggests that the company's mobility-related innovations are being reviewed by a highly specialized team.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| GRABER, MARIA EILEEN | 1 | 62.2% | +32.2% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18947882 | SEAT ELEMENT FOR A VEHICLE SEAT AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING A CORRESPONDING SEAT ELEMENT | GRABER, MARIA EILEEN | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3644 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18947882 | SEAT ELEMENT FOR A VEHICLE SEAT AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING A CORRESPONDING SEAT ELEMENT | GRABER, MARIA EILEEN | 3644 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 14, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial