Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology areas: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Industrial Laser Machines LLC has 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. The prosecution is currently managed by a distinct examiner and a distinct art unit. This indicates a focused intellectual property strategy within this specific technical field. By concentrating its efforts in a single art unit, the company can ensure that its technical arguments are tailored to the specific examination criteria of that administrative division.
The busiest examiner, EISEMAN, LYNSEY C, is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This figure represents the full extent of the company's pending office actions. With only 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit involved, the company's immediate prosecution efforts are concentrated on addressing the specific concerns of this single examiner. Practitioners should focus on the examination style of EISEMAN, LYNSEY C, as the outcome of this 1 pending office action will determine the company's immediate success in securing patent protection for its laser technology innovations.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 2 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| NELSON, HUNTER JARED | 1 | 38.7% | +24.5% |
| EISEMAN, LYNSEY C | 1 | 49.1% | +39.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18198925 | Techniques For Delivering Laser Energy To A Target Site Of An Organism | EISEMAN, LYNSEY C | 23d |
| 18236242 | Monolithic Integrated Enclosure | NELSON, HUNTER JARED | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18198925 | Techniques For Delivering Laser Energy To A Target Site Of An Organism | EISEMAN, LYNSEY C | 23d |
| 18236242 | Monolithic Integrated Enclosure | NELSON, HUNTER JARED | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2828 | 1 |
| 3796 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18236242 | Monolithic Integrated Enclosure | NELSON, HUNTER JARED | 2828 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 21, 2023 |
| 18198925 | Techniques For Delivering Laser Energy To A Target Site Of An Organism | EISEMAN, LYNSEY C | 3796 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | 23d | Pending | May 18, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial