Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Infinite Orbits

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Infinite Orbits currently faces 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This activity is confined to 1 distinct art unit and involves a distinct examiner. HERRERA, MICHAEL J is the busiest examiner for the company, holding the pending action. The portfolio's current prosecution is entirely centralized, with all pending matters residing with a particular examiner.

The concentration of the portfolio within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems field suggests a specialized development focus. Because the company is dealing with a distinct examiner, the prosecution strategy can be highly tailored to that individual's specific requirements and historical patterns. This streamlined approach may allow for more direct negotiation during the examination process. Practitioners should focus on the specific preferences of the assigned examiner to efficiently move the application toward allowance.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HERRERA, MICHAEL J 1 64.8% +29.2%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18713778 VISION-BASED AUTONOMOUS NAVIGATION SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR A SATELLITE HERRERA, MICHAEL J —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3668 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18713778 VISION-BASED AUTONOMOUS NAVIGATION SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR A SATELLITE HERRERA, MICHAEL J 3668 §103 Final Rejection — Pending May 28, 2024

Managing Infinite Orbits's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month