Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology areas: Communications • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Infinitus Holdings Inc. is managing 2 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are handled by 2 distinct examiners across 2 distinct art units. This indicates that each pending matter is being treated as a separate technical and administrative entity, requiring the company to navigate different sets of procedures and technical standards within the office. The presence of 2 pending office actions shows a focused but divided prosecution effort.
The busiest examiner, HALLORAN, THOMAS JAMES, holds 1 busiest examiner pending action. Since there are 2 pending office actions in total, the workload is split between HALLORAN, THOMAS JAMES and the other distinct examiner, with each handling 1 action in their respective art unit. For practitioners, this means that the prosecution strategy for the 2 pending office actions must be highly individualized. Because there are 2 distinct art units and 2 distinct examiners involved, there is no overlap in the personnel or administrative groups reviewing the company's applications. This lack of concentration requires a broad approach to managing the company's current patent matters.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| HALLORAN, THOMAS JAMES | 1 | 100.0% | +0.0% |
| LAWRENCE, JOHN CALEB | 1 | 100.0% | +0.0% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18799909 | GRAPHENE-BASED PHASED ARRAY ANTENNA FOR DEVICE TRACKING | LAWRENCE, JOHN CALEB | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18897590 | HIGH-EDGE ANTENNAS FOR OPTIMIZED SAR PERFORMANCE | HALLORAN, THOMAS JAMES | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3648 | 1 |
| 2646 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18897590 | HIGH-EDGE ANTENNAS FOR OPTIMIZED SAR PERFORMANCE | HALLORAN, THOMAS JAMES | 3648 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 26, 2024 |
| 18799909 | GRAPHENE-BASED PHASED ARRAY ANTENNA FOR DEVICE TRACKING | LAWRENCE, JOHN CALEB | 2646 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 09, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial