Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Networking & Security
3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days
Infobip Ltd. has 3 pending office actions in the Networking & Security technology area. These actions are distributed among 3 distinct examiners, which means each pending application is being handled by a different person. This requires a prosecution strategy that addresses the individual preferences of 3 different examiners for the filings.
The 3 pending office actions are spread across 2 distinct art units. This distribution indicates that the company's Networking & Security intellectual property is being reviewed by 2 different technical groups within the patent office. Practitioners should be aware of potential differences in how these distinct art units apply examination guidelines to the applications.
GERGISO, TECHANE is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, with 1 pending office action. Because this individual is one of 3 distinct examiners each holding 1 action, there is no single examiner who dominates the current prosecution. Legal teams must manage separate examiner relationships and navigate 2 distinct art units to advance the pending office actions.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (33%) |
| §103 only | 1 (33%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (33%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| GERGISO, TECHANE | 1 | 84.6% | +24.1% |
| WU, NICHOLAS S | 1 | 52.4% | +31.4% |
| NOEL, LYDIA LOUIS-FILS | 1 | 68.3% | +24.7% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18894320 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MULTI-FACTOR AUTHENTICATION | GERGISO, TECHANE | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18452636 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR END USER AUTHENTICATION | NOEL, LYDIA LOUIS-FILS | 28d |
| 18624747 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO BUILD AUTOMATED BOTS USING GENERATIVE LEARNING | WU, NICHOLAS S | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18452636 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR END USER AUTHENTICATION | NOEL, LYDIA LOUIS-FILS | 28d |
| 18894320 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MULTI-FACTOR AUTHENTICATION | GERGISO, TECHANE | — |
| 18624747 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO BUILD AUTOMATED BOTS USING GENERATIVE LEARNING | WU, NICHOLAS S | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2408 | 1 |
| 2437 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18894320 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MULTI-FACTOR AUTHENTICATION | GERGISO, TECHANE | 2408 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Sep 24, 2024 |
| 18624747 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO BUILD AUTOMATED BOTS USING GENERATIVE LEARNING | WU, NICHOLAS S | — | §101§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 02, 2024 |
| 18452636 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR END USER AUTHENTICATION | NOEL, LYDIA LOUIS-FILS | 2437 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | 28d | Pending | Aug 21, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial