Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Ingamar Co. Ltd. currently has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This action is being processed by 1 distinct examiner within 1 distinct art unit. This concentration indicates a focused prosecution strategy for the company's current intellectual property. The alignment of the pending matter within a single art unit suggests that the technology involved is specialized and fits clearly into one mechanical or e-commerce classification.
LUGO, CARLOS is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, managing 1 pending office action. Because there is only 1 distinct examiner and 1 pending office action, this examiner is responsible for the company's entire active workload. The alignment of 1 distinct art unit and 1 distinct examiner suggests a singular technical path for the pending application. For the company, this means that the success of its current prosecution efforts depends on navigating the specific requirements and feedback provided by this one examiner in their respective art unit.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LUGO, CARLOS | 1 | 74.9% | +13.6% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18406012 | Electronic device lock | LUGO, CARLOS | 42d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3675 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18406012 | Electronic device lock | LUGO, CARLOS | 3675 | §103 | Final Rejection | 42d overdue | Pending | Jan 05, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialIngamar Co. Ltd. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Carlos Lugo has the most, with 1 of Ingamar Co. Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
