Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Innatera Nanosystems B V

1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Innatera Nanosystems B V has 1 pending office action currently active in its patent portfolio. This single action is being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner, representing the totality of the company's current prosecution efforts. The portfolio shows 0 distinct art units, which suggests the technology may be specialized or in a unique category at the USPTO.

The busiest examiner, LI, YONGHONG, is responsible for the 1 pending office action. Because the entire workload is handled by this one examiner, the company's immediate patent outcomes are tied to this individual's decisions. Practitioners should focus on the specific examination patterns of this examiner to navigate the single pending matter effectively.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
100% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LI, YONGHONG 1 76.5% +22.0%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18853741 METHOD FOR EFFICIENT RADAR PRE-PROCESSING LI, YONGHONG —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18853741 METHOD FOR EFFICIENT RADAR PRE-PROCESSING LI, YONGHONG —

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18853741 METHOD FOR EFFICIENT RADAR PRE-PROCESSING LI, YONGHONG — §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 03, 2024

Managing Innatera Nanosystems B V's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month