Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Inno Instrument America Inc. is currently navigating 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This single matter is assigned to a distinct examiner. The prosecution is localized within 1 distinct art unit, representing a highly focused point of contact with the patent office. This structure implies that the company's current active prosecution is limited to a single technical path and a single individual's review.
LARS A OLSON is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, holding the pending office action currently on record. Given that the total number of pending actions is 1, this examiner manages the entirety of the company's active office action workload. The alignment of the examiner and the art unit for the action indicates a singular point of interaction for the company. For the practitioner, this means that the outcome of the company's current prosecution efforts depends entirely on the findings of this specific examiner within the designated art unit.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §112 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| OLSON, LARS A | 1 | 81.9% | +14.0% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18900830 | ELECTRIC HYDROFOIL | OLSON, LARS A | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18900830 | ELECTRIC HYDROFOIL | OLSON, LARS A | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3615 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18900830 | ELECTRIC HYDROFOIL | OLSON, LARS A | 3615 | §112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 29, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial