Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Innochi Inc. has 1 pending office action in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. Prosecution is handled by 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. The use of 1 distinct art unit suggests that the company's semiconductor or optical technology is being evaluated by a single specialized group. This focused approach applies to the 1 pending office action currently active for the company.
Samanvitha Sridhar is the busiest examiner, overseeing the 1 pending office action. This action constitutes the 1 pending office action currently active. Since Samanvitha Sridhar is the only one of the 1 distinct examiners involved, this individual is responsible for the entire current workload. The 1 busiest examiner pending action assigned to this examiner represents the full extent of the company's active prosecution.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SRIDHAR, SAMANVITHA | 1 | 61.5% | +31.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18575503 | Method For Measuring Trunk Balance, Method For Determining Color Of Lens For Eyewear, Method For Determining Color Of Contact Lens, Method For Determining Color Of Frame For Eyewear, And Method For Determining Color Of Wearable Item For Human | SRIDHAR, SAMANVITHA | 61d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18575503 | Method For Measuring Trunk Balance, Method For Determining Color Of Lens For Eyewear, Method For Determining Color Of Contact Lens, Method For Determining Color Of Frame For Eyewear, And Method For Determining Color Of Wearable Item For Human | SRIDHAR, SAMANVITHA | 61d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2872 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18575503 | Method For Measuring Trunk Balance, Method For Determining Color Of Lens For Eyewear, Method For Determining Color Of Contact Lens, Method For Determining Color Of Frame For Eyewear, And Method For Determining Color Of Wearable Item For Human | SRIDHAR, SAMANVITHA | 2872 | §102§103§112 | Final Rejection | 61d | Pending | Dec 29, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial