Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Innomaq 21 S L is active in the Chemistry & Materials technology area with 1 pending office action. The company's prosecution is currently managed by 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This reflects a concentrated effort within a specific scientific domain at the patent office. The presence of only 1 pending action indicates a period of focused prosecution activity for the firm within the Chemistry & Materials sector, with no other active matters currently distributed across the office.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio is SHAMS, NAZMUN NAHAR, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. With only 1 pending action in the company's total portfolio, SHAMS, NAZMUN NAHAR handles all current prosecution matters. This 1 to 1 relationship between the pending action and the examiner defines the company's current interaction with the patent office. For the practitioner, this means that the examiner's individual tendencies and the specific requirements of the 1 distinct art unit will be the primary factors determining the success of the current portfolio.
The alignment of the company's 1 pending action with a single examiner provides a clear and direct path for prosecution. This lack of complexity in the administrative structure can simplify communication and tracking for the legal team. However, it also means that any challenges encountered with SHAMS, NAZMUN NAHAR will affect the company's entire pending patent presence. The focus on a single art unit further underscores the specialized nature of the technology currently being sought for protection.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SHAMS, NAZMUN NAHAR | 1 | 80.6% | +18.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18437401 | METHOD FOR THE OBTAINING COST EFFECTIVE POWDER | SHAMS, NAZMUN NAHAR | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18437401 | METHOD FOR THE OBTAINING COST EFFECTIVE POWDER | SHAMS, NAZMUN NAHAR | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1738 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18437401 | METHOD FOR THE OBTAINING COST EFFECTIVE POWDER | SHAMS, NAZMUN NAHAR | 1738 | §101§102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Feb 09, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial