Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Innomed Technologies Inc. has a patent portfolio in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. There are currently 2 pending office actions. These actions are being handled by 2 distinct examiners, but both are located within the same 1 distinct art unit, showing a high degree of technical concentration.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio is TAYLOR, MARISSA ENVENESIA, who is managing 1 busiest examiner pending action. Since there are 2 pending office actions in total, each examiner is responsible for one action. The fact that both examiners are in 1 distinct art unit suggests a highly consistent technical environment for the company's medical device prosecution. Practitioners can expect the same art unit standards to apply to both pending matters, even though they are being reviewed by 2 distinct examiners.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| TAYLOR, MARISSA ENVENESIA | 1 | 77.4% | +31.8% |
| STIMPERT, PHILIP EARL | 1 | 63.3% | +48.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18912446 | PRECISION DISPENSING | TAYLOR, MARISSA ENVENESIA | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18912446 | PRECISION DISPENSING | TAYLOR, MARISSA ENVENESIA | — |
| 18075158 | ANTIMICROBIAL COATING CONTAINING ERYTHRITOL | STIMPERT, PHILIP EARL | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3783 | 2 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18912446 | PRECISION DISPENSING | TAYLOR, MARISSA ENVENESIA | 3783 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 10, 2024 |
| 18075158 | ANTIMICROBIAL COATING CONTAINING ERYTHRITOL | STIMPERT, PHILIP EARL | 3783 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Dec 05, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialInnomed Technologies Inc. has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 2 examiners.
Marissa Envenesia Taylor has the most, with 1 of Innomed Technologies Inc.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
