Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Innovasea maintains a company patent portfolio in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The prosecution data shows 1 pending office action currently on file at the USPTO. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, HOBSON, STEPHEN, who is the only examiner identified for the company. The portfolio is concentrated within a distinct art unit, suggesting a specific technical focus for the current filings. HOBSON, STEPHEN is the busiest examiner, managing the busiest examiner pending action.
For practitioners, the involvement of a distinct examiner and a distinct art unit indicates a highly localized prosecution environment. The presence of 1 pending office action allows for a legal strategy tailored to the specific tendencies of HOBSON, STEPHEN. Because the busiest examiner pending count is not spread across multiple individuals, the prosecution remains centralized. This focus within the Chemistry & Materials sector allows for a consistent approach to navigating the assigned art unit and addressing technical rejections.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| HOBSON, STEPHEN | 1 | 65.4% | +20.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17549957 | HIGH EFFICIENCY WATER DISTRIBUTION PLATE DESIGN FOR ENHANCED OXYGEN TRANSFER | HOBSON, STEPHEN | 476d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17549957 | HIGH EFFICIENCY WATER DISTRIBUTION PLATE DESIGN FOR ENHANCED OXYGEN TRANSFER | HOBSON, STEPHEN | 476d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1776 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17549957 | HIGH EFFICIENCY WATER DISTRIBUTION PLATE DESIGN FOR ENHANCED OXYGEN TRANSFER | HOBSON, STEPHEN | 1776 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | 476d overdue | Pending | Dec 14, 2021 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial