Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology areas: Networking & Security • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Innovusion, Inc. currently manages 1 pending office action within the Networking & Security technology area. This single active matter represents the company's current focus at the USPTO. The case is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, which allows for a direct and focused dialogue between the applicant and the examiner.
The prosecution is situated within 1 distinct art unit. This indicates that the technology is highly specialized within the networking sector. Because the portfolio is limited to 1 distinct art unit, the practitioner can focus on the specific examination standards and precedents relevant to that particular department.
RAHMAN, MOHAMMAD J is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, currently responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending action. As the sole examiner involved in the company's current prosecution, RAHMAN, MOHAMMAD J will have a significant impact on the eventual outcome of the claims. Understanding the specific examination style of RAHMAN, MOHAMMAD J is critical.
With 1 pending office action, the prosecution strategy is focused on a single set of requirements. The practitioner can devote resources to addressing the specific concerns raised in the Networking & Security area. This environment allows for a targeted response to the office action issued by the USPTO.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (50%) |
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISHIZUKA, YOSHIHISA | 1 | 68.8% | +19.5% |
| RAHMAN, MOHAMMAD J | 1 | 79.8% | +9.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18369112 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR IDENTIFYING FALLING OBJECT BASED ON LIDAR SYSTEM, AND READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM | ISHIZUKA, YOSHIHISA | 27d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18369112 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR IDENTIFYING FALLING OBJECT BASED ON LIDAR SYSTEM, AND READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM | ISHIZUKA, YOSHIHISA | 27d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2857 | 1 |
| 2487 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18369112 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR IDENTIFYING FALLING OBJECT BASED ON LIDAR SYSTEM, AND READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM | ISHIZUKA, YOSHIHISA | 2857 | §101§112 | Final Rejection | 27d | Pending | Sep 15, 2023 |
| 18367425 | DATA FUSION METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR LiDAR SYSTEM AND READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM | RAHMAN, MOHAMMAD J | 2487 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Sep 12, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial