Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Inpress Precision Ltd.

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Inpress Precision Ltd. has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This matter is handled by a distinct examiner in 1 distinct art unit. The current prosecution profile is limited to this active case, which represents the company's immediate focus at the patent office.

UBER, NATHAN C is the busiest examiner for the company, managing the pending office action. This represents the total volume of pending actions for the portfolio. Success for this portfolio currently depends on the outcome of this interaction within the assigned art unit. Practitioners should tailor their arguments to the specific standards of the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems area. The limited scope of the current prosecution allows for a dedicated approach to this pending office action. Ensuring a favorable result in this art unit is critical for the company's intellectual property strategy.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
UBER, NATHAN C 1 3.4% +5.5%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19153331 A System for Identification of a Plastic Container for Re-Use or Recycling UBER, NATHAN C —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3626 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19153331 A System for Identification of a Plastic Container for Re-Use or Recycling UBER, NATHAN C 3626 §101§102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 03, 2025

Managing Inpress Precision Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month