Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Inrigo AS has 1 pending office action within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This portfolio is handled by 1 distinct examiner, CEPLUCH, ALYSSA L, and is located in 1 distinct art unit. CEPLUCH, ALYSSA L is the busiest examiner with 1 busiest examiner pending action, meaning the prosecution effort is currently consolidated under a single examiner and administrative unit.
The data shows 1 pending office action, which suggests a narrow prosecution pipeline. Since the portfolio involves only 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, the applicant's success is tied to the specific requirements of these entities. There are no other pending matters in the data to provide a baseline for comparison within the company's own history. Practitioners should prioritize understanding the historical patterns of CEPLUCH, ALYSSA L and the standards of the 1 art unit involved. This structure makes the portfolio easy to monitor but increases the impact of the decision-making process of the 1 distinct examiner on the 1 pending office action.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| CEPLUCH, ALYSSA L | 1 | 63.0% | +24.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18725615 | Method and Device for Pyrolysis-Based Production of Hydrocarbon Oils Based on Plastic Containing Raw Material | CEPLUCH, ALYSSA L | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18725615 | Method and Device for Pyrolysis-Based Production of Hydrocarbon Oils Based on Plastic Containing Raw Material | CEPLUCH, ALYSSA L | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1772 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18725615 | Method and Device for Pyrolysis-Based Production of Hydrocarbon Oils Based on Plastic Containing Raw Material | CEPLUCH, ALYSSA L | 1772 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 28, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial