Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Insight Molecular Diagnostics Inc. currently has 1 pending office action within the technology area of Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems. This action is being handled by a single distinct examiner, EVANS, ASHLEY ELIZABETH. The prosecution is localized within a single art unit, reflecting a very specific and narrow focus for the company's current patent activity in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector.
The busiest examiner, EVANS, ASHLEY ELIZABETH, is responsible for 1 pending action. With a single examiner and a single art unit involved, the prosecution path for this portfolio is currently centralized. This means the outcome of the pending office action depends entirely on the evaluation within that single art unit and by that specific examiner.
For a portfolio of this size, the data shows a direct correlation between the number of pending office actions and the number of examiners. Since there is only a single pending office action, the involvement of a single examiner and a single art unit is expected. Practitioners can focus their efforts on the specific requirements of the assigned examiner within the context of the technology area.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| EVANS, ASHLEY ELIZABETH | 1 | 17.2% | +39.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18835307 | CLASSIFYING TUMORS AND PREDICTING RESPONSIVENESS | EVANS, ASHLEY ELIZABETH | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18835307 | CLASSIFYING TUMORS AND PREDICTING RESPONSIVENESS | EVANS, ASHLEY ELIZABETH | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3687 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18835307 | CLASSIFYING TUMORS AND PREDICTING RESPONSIVENESS | EVANS, ASHLEY ELIZABETH | 3687 | §101 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Aug 01, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial