Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Computing & Software
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 25 patents granted in the last 365 days
Inspur Suzhou Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. maintains a patent portfolio within the Computing & Software technology area. The company is currently responding to 2 pending office actions. Unlike portfolios spread across multiple departments, these actions are concentrated within 1 distinct art unit. This concentration implies that the prosecution strategy remains focused on a specific regulatory environment within the patent office, even as the company engages with 2 distinct examiners.
HU, SELINA ELISA serves as the busiest examiner for this portfolio, with 1 pending office action currently under review. Because there are 2 distinct examiners in total, HU, SELINA ELISA is responsible for a significant share of the pending workload. The fact that the 2 distinct examiners are working within the 1 distinct art unit suggests that the company's applications are being reviewed by different individuals who likely share similar departmental guidelines. Practitioners should monitor the 1 pending office action assigned to HU, SELINA ELISA to ensure consistency across the Computing & Software filings.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (50%) |
| §101 + other | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| HU, SELINA ELISA | 1 | 66.7% | +83.3% |
| WAJE, CARLO C | 1 | 68.3% | +33.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18029705 | VIRTUAL MACHINE DEPLOYMENT METHOD AND APPARATUS, DEVICE, AND READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM | HU, SELINA ELISA | 12d |
| 18013812 | Data Consistency Check Method and System based on ICC | WAJE, CARLO C | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18029705 | VIRTUAL MACHINE DEPLOYMENT METHOD AND APPARATUS, DEVICE, AND READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM | HU, SELINA ELISA | 12d |
| 18013812 | Data Consistency Check Method and System based on ICC | WAJE, CARLO C | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2193 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18029705 | VIRTUAL MACHINE DEPLOYMENT METHOD AND APPARATUS, DEVICE, AND READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM | HU, SELINA ELISA | 2193 | §101 | Final Rejection | 12d | Pending | Sep 07, 2023 |
| 18013812 | Data Consistency Check Method and System based on ICC | WAJE, CARLO C | — | §101§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 29, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial