Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Institut Curie

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Institut Curie currently has 3 pending office actions within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. These actions are spread across 3 distinct examiners and 3 distinct art units. This correspondence between actions, examiners, and art units suggests that each pending matter is being treated as a separate technical and administrative path. The involvement of 3 distinct art units indicates that the company's biotechnology research is being evaluated by diverse specialized groups within the office.

The busiest examiner, TRAN, ERIC, is currently managing 1 pending office action. This represents a portion of the total 3 pending office actions for the portfolio. The presence of multiple examiners for the active actions means that each examiner is currently handling exactly one matter for the portfolio. This structure requires the company to manage three separate administrative relationships within the patent office simultaneously.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
TRAN, ERIC 1 69.8% +19.4%
KONOPKA, CATHERINE ANNE 1 57.5% +66.2%
REILLY, SOPHIA JANE 1 60.0% +49.4%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18284253 PREPARATION METHOD OF QUINOLINE DERIVATIVE COMPOUNDS REILLY, SOPHIA JANE 20d
18686403 NITROGEN-CONTAINING DERIVATIVES OF NARASIN, SYNTHESIS AND USES THEREOF TRAN, ERIC —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18284253 PREPARATION METHOD OF QUINOLINE DERIVATIVE COMPOUNDS REILLY, SOPHIA JANE 20d
18686403 NITROGEN-CONTAINING DERIVATIVES OF NARASIN, SYNTHESIS AND USES THEREOF TRAN, ERIC —
18684020 USE OF ETV3 OR ETV6 INHIBITORS FOR BLOCKING THE DIFFERENTIATION OF MONOCYTES INTO DENDRITIC CELLS KONOPKA, CATHERINE ANNE —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1629 1
1635 1
1627 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18686403 NITROGEN-CONTAINING DERIVATIVES OF NARASIN, SYNTHESIS AND USES THEREOF TRAN, ERIC 1629 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Feb 23, 2024
18684020 USE OF ETV3 OR ETV6 INHIBITORS FOR BLOCKING THE DIFFERENTIATION OF MONOCYTES INTO DENDRITIC CELLS KONOPKA, CATHERINE ANNE 1635 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Feb 15, 2024
18284253 PREPARATION METHOD OF QUINOLINE DERIVATIVE COMPOUNDS REILLY, SOPHIA JANE 1627 §103§112 Final Rejection 20d Pending Sep 26, 2023

Managing Institut Curie's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Institut Curie have?

Institut Curie has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Institut Curie applications?

Eric Tran has the most, with 1 of Institut Curie's pending office actions.

What technology area are Institut Curie's patent applications in?

Mostly Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals (USPTO Tech Center 1600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month