Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Institut Mines-Télécom

Technology area: Networking & Security

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Institut Mines-Télécom has 1 pending office action in the Networking & Security technology area. The company's prosecution is currently handled by 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, indicating a concentrated effort on a specific networking technology. This structure allows for a focused legal strategy, as the company only needs to address the concerns of 1 individual at the patent office. However, it also means that the company's current patent prospects are dependent on that examiner's review.

The busiest examiner for the portfolio is ANDERSON, MARGARET MARIE, who is responsible for the 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This examiner is the 1 currently reviewing the pending work, so their perspective on the networking and security claims is critical. Because there is 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, the company can tailor its responses to a specific set of examination standards. Resolving the 1 pending office action will require a precise response to the specific issues identified by this examiner.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
100% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ANDERSON, MARGARET MARIE 1 71.4% +13.2%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18032843 Pre-Processing in Uplink RAN Using Neural Network ANDERSON, MARGARET MARIE 111d overdue

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2412 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18032843 Pre-Processing in Uplink RAN Using Neural Network ANDERSON, MARGARET MARIE 2412 §103 Final Rejection 111d overdue Pending Apr 20, 2023

Managing Institut Mines-Télécom's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month