Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Institute For Musculoskeletal Science And Education Ltd.

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

3 pending office actions • 1 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

The Institute For Musculoskeletal Science And Education Ltd. currently has 3 pending office actions within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These 3 actions are assigned to 3 distinct examiners, meaning that no two actions share the same reviewer. The busiest examiner, GIBSON, ERIC SHANE, is responsible for 1 pending action. This distribution shows that the company's current workload is spread evenly across the 3 distinct examiners.

All 3 pending actions are located within 1 distinct art unit. For a practitioner, this provides a consistent administrative and technical environment, as all matters are being handled within the same USPTO division. However, the use of 3 distinct examiners means that the company must still navigate 3 different individual examination styles. The focus on Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering defines the technical scope of these 3 actions. While the art unit is singular, the 3 different examiners will each apply their own interpretation to the pending office actions. This requires a flexible strategy that can adapt to the specific preferences of each official while maintaining consistency within the single art unit. The lack of examiner overlap prevents the use of cross-case insights but ensures a broad review of the company's medical device portfolio.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (33%)
1
Medium (33%)
1
Easy (33%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Double-patenting only1 (33%)
Double-patenting + other1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
33% of docket
2
Business / Other
67% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
GIBSON, ERIC SHANE 1 85.4% +17.2%
HARVEY, JULIANNA NANCY 1 77.9% +19.2%
SUMMITT, LYNNSY M 1 68.3% +43.8%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19190918 Implant With Structural Members Arranged Around A Ring GIBSON, ERIC SHANE —

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18514415 Implant With Curved Bone Contacting Elements SUMMITT, LYNNSY M 27d

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18514415 Implant With Curved Bone Contacting Elements SUMMITT, LYNNSY M 27d
19190918 Implant With Structural Members Arranged Around A Ring GIBSON, ERIC SHANE —
19011502 Implant with Improved Bone Contact HARVEY, JULIANNA NANCY —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3773 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19190918 Implant With Structural Members Arranged Around A Ring GIBSON, ERIC SHANE — DP Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 28, 2025
19011502 Implant with Improved Bone Contact HARVEY, JULIANNA NANCY — §103§112DPOther Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 06, 2025
18514415 Implant With Curved Bone Contacting Elements SUMMITT, LYNNSY M 3773 §102§103§112Other Non-Final OA 27d Pending Nov 20, 2023

Managing Institute For Musculoskeletal Science And Education Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month