Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Integra Enclosures Limited currently manages 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and is situated within 1 distinct art unit. This suggests a specific focus for the company's current mechanical and enclosure-related patent filings. The involvement of 1 distinct art unit indicates that the company is dealing with a consistent set of standards for its mechanical systems applications.
MORGAN, EMILY M is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, with 1 pending office action under review. Because there is 1 distinct examiner, the company's prosecution strategy should be tailored to Morgan's specific examination style. The 1 pending office action represents the entirety of the company's current active prosecution in this field. This focused prosecution environment allows for a clear and direct path toward resolving the pending matter in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector.
Practitioners should focus on the 1 pending office action to ensure that all technical and procedural requirements are met. With 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, the administrative complexity of this portfolio is low. This allows the company to concentrate its efforts on the specific technical challenges presented in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems field. Efficiently navigating the requirements of the 1 distinct art unit will be essential for the company's mechanical intellectual property strategy.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MORGAN, EMILY M | 1 | 35.5% | +33.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18086562 | HINGE PIN KEEPER AND ENCLOSURE WITH AMBIDEXTROUS LIFT OFF-HINGE | MORGAN, EMILY M | 9d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18086562 | HINGE PIN KEEPER AND ENCLOSURE WITH AMBIDEXTROUS LIFT OFF-HINGE | MORGAN, EMILY M | 9d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3677 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18086562 | HINGE PIN KEEPER AND ENCLOSURE WITH AMBIDEXTROUS LIFT OFF-HINGE | MORGAN, EMILY M | 3677 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | 9d | Pending | Dec 21, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial