Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Integrated Automation Systems LLC currently manages 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This single action is being handled by 1 distinct examiner, indicating a highly concentrated prosecution focus at this stage. The workload is further localized within 1 distinct art unit, which suggests a very specific technical review process for the company's current patent activity.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is HARP, WILLIAM RAY, who is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Because the total number of pending office actions is 1, this examiner oversees the entirety of the company's current active patent prosecution. This alignment between the total pending actions and the busiest examiner's workload suggests a singular point of contact for the portfolio's immediate legal requirements. For practitioners, this means the outcome of the current prosecution phase depends entirely on the review of this 1 distinct examiner within the specified 1 distinct art unit. This streamlined structure allows for a direct and focused engagement with the patent office during the examination of the company's mechanical systems technology.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| HARP, WILLIAM RAY | 1 | 79.1% | +10.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18898783 | RACKING SYSTEM AND METHOD | HARP, WILLIAM RAY | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18898783 | RACKING SYSTEM AND METHOD | HARP, WILLIAM RAY | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3653 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18898783 | RACKING SYSTEM AND METHOD | HARP, WILLIAM RAY | 3653 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Sep 27, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialIntegrated Automation Systems LLC has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
William Ray Harp has the most, with 1 of Integrated Automation Systems LLC's pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
