Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Integrated Dna Technologies Inc.

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

6 pending office actions • 4 art units • 6 examiners • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 7 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Integrated Dna Technologies Inc. has 7 pending office actions in Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals. The matters span 6 distinct examiners and 4 distinct art units, showing examiner diversity alongside recurring art-unit assignments. The portfolio benefits from centralized tracking of art-unit developments and separate examiner-specific response planning.

OYEYEMI, OLAYINKA A is the busiest examiner, with 2 pending matters. That examiner carries the largest stated assignment, while the remaining matters are spread across the other examination channels.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (83%)
1
Medium (17%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Double-patenting + other1 (17%)
Multi-statute (no §101)5 (83%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

6
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
RAMIREZ, DELIA M 1 65.1% +56.3%
OYEYEMI, OLAYINKA A 1 60.4% +46.5%
WILSON, MICHAEL C 1 41.5% +17.8%
HORLICK, KENNETH R 1 79.0% +15.3%
RYAN, DOUGLAS CHARLES 1 38.2% +48.4%
HUTSON, RICHARD G 1 65.1% +52.9%

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18908672 OPTIMIZED PROTEIN FUSIONS AND LINKERS RAMIREZ, DELIA M —
18613719 USE OF A 53BP1 BINDING HUMAN UBIQUITIN VARIANT TO IMPROVE RATES OF HDR IN MULTIPLE CELL TYPES WILSON, MICHAEL C —
18417992 METHODS FOR VARIANT DETECTION HORLICK, KENNETH R —
18404826 CRISPR-BASED COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF USE RYAN, DOUGLAS CHARLES —
18176091 C-TERMINAL PEPTIDE EXTENSIONS WITH INCREASED ACTIVITY HUTSON, RICHARD G —

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18908672 OPTIMIZED PROTEIN FUSIONS AND LINKERS RAMIREZ, DELIA M —
18816789 METHODS FOR VARIANT DETECTION OYEYEMI, OLAYINKA A —
18613719 USE OF A 53BP1 BINDING HUMAN UBIQUITIN VARIANT TO IMPROVE RATES OF HDR IN MULTIPLE CELL TYPES WILSON, MICHAEL C —
18417992 METHODS FOR VARIANT DETECTION HORLICK, KENNETH R —
18404826 CRISPR-BASED COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF USE RYAN, DOUGLAS CHARLES —
18176091 C-TERMINAL PEPTIDE EXTENSIONS WITH INCREASED ACTIVITY HUTSON, RICHARD G —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1652 2
1681 2
1638 1
1635 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18908672 OPTIMIZED PROTEIN FUSIONS AND LINKERS RAMIREZ, DELIA M 1652 §102§103§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 07, 2024
18816789 METHODS FOR VARIANT DETECTION OYEYEMI, OLAYINKA A 1681 §103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 27, 2024
18613719 USE OF A 53BP1 BINDING HUMAN UBIQUITIN VARIANT TO IMPROVE RATES OF HDR IN MULTIPLE CELL TYPES WILSON, MICHAEL C 1638 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 22, 2024
18417992 METHODS FOR VARIANT DETECTION HORLICK, KENNETH R 1681 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 19, 2024
18404826 CRISPR-BASED COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF USE RYAN, DOUGLAS CHARLES 1635 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 04, 2024
18176091 C-TERMINAL PEPTIDE EXTENSIONS WITH INCREASED ACTIVITY HUTSON, RICHARD G 1652 §102§112 Final Rejection — Pending Feb 28, 2023

Managing Integrated Dna Technologies Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Integrated Dna Technologies Inc. have?

Integrated Dna Technologies Inc. has 6 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 4 art units and 6 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Integrated Dna Technologies Inc. applications?

Delia M Ramirez has the most, with 1 of Integrated Dna Technologies Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Integrated Dna Technologies Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals (USPTO Tech Center 1600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month