Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Integrated Dynamics Engineering GmbH

Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Integrated Dynamics Engineering GmbH currently manages 2 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These are assigned to 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units. WILLIAMS, THOMAS J is the busiest examiner, handling 1 pending office action.

The 2 pending office actions are evenly split between the 2 distinct examiners involved. This distribution across 2 distinct art units suggests that the company's current prosecution effort is diversified within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector. Practitioners must address the specific preferences of 2 different examiners to resolve the 2 pending office actions.

Since WILLIAMS, THOMAS J is responsible for 1 pending office action, no single examiner holds a majority of the pending workload. The presence of 2 distinct art units indicates that the 2 pending office actions are being reviewed in different technical contexts. This requires a flexible strategy to accommodate the distinct procedural tendencies of the 2 examiners.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (50%)
1
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
WILLIAMS, THOMAS J 1 78.7% +14.2%
ABRAHAM, JOSE K 1 83.5% +32.5%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18762917 METHOD FOR PROCESSING SUBSTRATES, IN PARTICULAR WAFERS, MASKS OR FLAT PANEL DISPLAYS, WITH A SEMI-CONDUCTOR INDUSTRY MACHINE ABRAHAM, JOSE K 75d

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18860154 VIBRATION ISOLATOR HAVING A COIL SPRING AND AN ACTUATOR WILLIAMS, THOMAS J —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18762917 METHOD FOR PROCESSING SUBSTRATES, IN PARTICULAR WAFERS, MASKS OR FLAT PANEL DISPLAYS, WITH A SEMI-CONDUCTOR INDUSTRY MACHINE ABRAHAM, JOSE K 75d
18860154 VIBRATION ISOLATOR HAVING A COIL SPRING AND AN ACTUATOR WILLIAMS, THOMAS J —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3616 1
3729 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18860154 VIBRATION ISOLATOR HAVING A COIL SPRING AND AN ACTUATOR WILLIAMS, THOMAS J 3616 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 25, 2024
18762917 METHOD FOR PROCESSING SUBSTRATES, IN PARTICULAR WAFERS, MASKS OR FLAT PANEL DISPLAYS, WITH A SEMI-CONDUCTOR INDUSTRY MACHINE ABRAHAM, JOSE K 3729 §103 Final Rejection 75d Pending Jul 03, 2024

Managing Integrated Dynamics Engineering GmbH's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Integrated Dynamics Engineering GmbH have?

Integrated Dynamics Engineering GmbH has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Integrated Dynamics Engineering GmbH applications?

Thomas J Williams has the most, with 1 of Integrated Dynamics Engineering GmbH's pending office actions.

What technology area are Integrated Dynamics Engineering GmbH's patent applications in?

Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month