Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Computing & Software
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Intempora maintains a patent portfolio focused on the Computing & Software technology area. The company currently faces 1 pending office action, which is handled by 1 distinct examiner. This indicates a focused point of contact for the company's current prosecution efforts within the patent office. Practitioners can focus their communication strategy on this individual to resolve the outstanding matter.
The prosecution activity is localized within 1 distinct art unit. This concentration suggests that the current legal challenges are confined to a specific technical niche within the broader software sector. Practitioner strategy can remain focused on the requirements of this 1 specific administrative division without the need to navigate multiple sets of internal guidelines or diverse art unit standards.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is WILLOUGHBY, ALICIA M, who is currently overseeing 1 pending office action. Because this examiner handles the 1 pending matter, the immediate outcome of the portfolio's prosecution depends entirely on the interactions with this individual official. The fact that the busiest examiner has 1 pending action confirms that the workload is not distributed across multiple staff members at this time.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| WILLOUGHBY, ALICIA M | 1 | 53.9% | +25.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18649411 | DYNAMIC DATASETS MANAGEMENT IN A SENSORS DATA MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | WILLOUGHBY, ALICIA M | 30d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18649411 | DYNAMIC DATASETS MANAGEMENT IN A SENSORS DATA MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | WILLOUGHBY, ALICIA M | 30d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2156 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18649411 | DYNAMIC DATASETS MANAGEMENT IN A SENSORS DATA MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | WILLOUGHBY, ALICIA M | 2156 | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | 30d | Pending | Apr 29, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial