Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Interacoustics A/S

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

4 pending office actions • 1 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Interacoustics A/S has 4 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These actions are handled by 4 distinct examiners, all of whom are located within 1 distinct art unit. This concentration in a single art unit indicates a very specific technical focus for the portfolio and a high degree of consistency in the examination environment.

CERIONI, DANIEL LEE is the busiest examiner, with 1 busiest examiner pending action. Because there are 4 pending office actions and 4 distinct examiners, each examiner is currently managing one action for the company. This distribution shows that while the company interacts with multiple examiners, they are all governed by the policies and culture of 1 distinct art unit. Practitioners may find that this simplifies the prosecution strategy, as all pending matters are being reviewed within the same specialized group.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (75%)
1
Medium (25%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (50%)
§103 only1 (25%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CERIONI, DANIEL LEE 1 64.3% +28.0%
HOFFPAUIR, ANDREW ELI 1 40.6% +50.8%
FERNANDES, PATRICK M 1 59.9% +31.6%
BALAJI, KAVYA SHOBANA 1 20.0% +63.5%

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18418373 COMPENSATION FOR THE MIDDLE-EAR IMPEDANCE MISMATCH IN OTOACOUSTIC-EMISSION MEASUREMENTS HOFFPAUIR, ANDREW ELI 12d
18807303 INSTRUMENT FOR DETECTING AUDITORY EVOKED NEURAL RESPONSES CERIONI, DANIEL LEE —
18502107 SYSTEM FOR ESTIMATING A HEARING ABILITY OF A TEST SUBJECT FERNANDES, PATRICK M —
17825267 SPECTRO-TEMPORAL MODULATION DETECTION TEST UNIT BALAJI, KAVYA SHOBANA —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18418373 COMPENSATION FOR THE MIDDLE-EAR IMPEDANCE MISMATCH IN OTOACOUSTIC-EMISSION MEASUREMENTS HOFFPAUIR, ANDREW ELI 12d
18807303 INSTRUMENT FOR DETECTING AUDITORY EVOKED NEURAL RESPONSES CERIONI, DANIEL LEE —
18502107 SYSTEM FOR ESTIMATING A HEARING ABILITY OF A TEST SUBJECT FERNANDES, PATRICK M —
17825267 SPECTRO-TEMPORAL MODULATION DETECTION TEST UNIT BALAJI, KAVYA SHOBANA —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3791 4

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18807303 INSTRUMENT FOR DETECTING AUDITORY EVOKED NEURAL RESPONSES CERIONI, DANIEL LEE 3791 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 16, 2024
18418373 COMPENSATION FOR THE MIDDLE-EAR IMPEDANCE MISMATCH IN OTOACOUSTIC-EMISSION MEASUREMENTS HOFFPAUIR, ANDREW ELI 3791 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA 12d Pending Jan 22, 2024
18502107 SYSTEM FOR ESTIMATING A HEARING ABILITY OF A TEST SUBJECT FERNANDES, PATRICK M 3791 §101§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 06, 2023
17825267 SPECTRO-TEMPORAL MODULATION DETECTION TEST UNIT BALAJI, KAVYA SHOBANA 3791 §103 Final Rejection — Pending May 26, 2022

Managing Interacoustics A/S's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Interacoustics A/S have?

Interacoustics A/S has 4 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 4 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Interacoustics A/S applications?

Daniel Lee Cerioni has the most, with 1 of Interacoustics A/S's pending office actions.

What technology area are Interacoustics A/S's patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month