Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026

Interactive Solutions Corp.

Technology area: Communications

4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 6 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Interactive Solutions Corp. currently manages 2 pending office actions within the Communications technology area. These 2 pending office actions are distributed across 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units. The 2 distinct examiners indicate that each matter is being reviewed by a different individual. The 2 distinct art units suggest that the filings are categorized into separate administrative divisions within the patent office.

MANOHARAN, SHASHIDHAR SHANKAR is identified as the busiest examiner for this portfolio. This examiner is responsible for 1 busiest_examiner_pending action. The 1 busiest_examiner_pending action is one of the 2 pending office actions currently active. MANOHARAN, SHASHIDHAR SHANKAR and the other distinct examiner handle the workload within the Communications technology area. The 2 distinct art units provide the technical context for these applications.

The 2 pending office actions require coordination with 2 distinct examiners. MANOHARAN, SHASHIDHAR SHANKAR holds 1 busiest_examiner_pending action, showing an even distribution of cases across the examiners. Practitioners should address the requirements of the 2 distinct art units to advance the portfolio. The Communications area defines the technical scope for both of the 2 pending office actions.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (75%)
1
Medium (25%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other3 (75%)
Double-patenting + other1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
4
Communications
100% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
AZARI, SEPEHR 1 66.8% +7.8%
OPSASNICK, MICHAEL N 1 81.9% +10.2%
MANOHARAN, SHASHIDHAR SHANKAR 1 75.0% +40.0%
JONES, CARISSA ANNE 1 72.5% +29.3%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19115775 CONVERSATION ASSISTANCE METHOD OPSASNICK, MICHAEL N —
19121797 METHOD FOR EVALUATING TEXT MANOHARAN, SHASHIDHAR SHANKAR —
18877256 Screen Composing Method Using Web Conferencing System JONES, CARISSA ANNE —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19115775 CONVERSATION ASSISTANCE METHOD OPSASNICK, MICHAEL N —
19121797 METHOD FOR EVALUATING TEXT MANOHARAN, SHASHIDHAR SHANKAR —
18877256 Screen Composing Method Using Web Conferencing System JONES, CARISSA ANNE —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2621 1
2658 1
2655 1
2691 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19401385 System that Causes Sharer to Detect Identity During Screen Sharing and System that Causes Sharer to Detect Information Regarding Inputted Answer Section AZARI, SEPEHR 2621 §102DP Final Rejection — Pending Nov 26, 2025
19115775 CONVERSATION ASSISTANCE METHOD OPSASNICK, MICHAEL N 2658 §101§102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 29, 2025
19121797 METHOD FOR EVALUATING TEXT MANOHARAN, SHASHIDHAR SHANKAR 2655 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 16, 2025
18877256 Screen Composing Method Using Web Conferencing System JONES, CARISSA ANNE 2691 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 19, 2024

Managing Interactive Solutions Corp.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Interactive Solutions Corp. have?

Interactive Solutions Corp. has 4 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 4 art units and 4 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Interactive Solutions Corp. applications?

Sepehr Azari has the most, with 1 of Interactive Solutions Corp.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Interactive Solutions Corp.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Communications (USPTO Tech Center 2600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month