Technology areas: Communications • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 10 patents granted in the last 365 days
International Institute Of Information Technology Hyderabad has 2 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These 2 actions are assigned to 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units. This means that each of the company's current matters is being processed in a unique administrative and technical environment within the patent office. The use of 2 distinct art units suggests that the 2 pending office actions involve different technological classifications within the broader transportation and mechanical sector.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio is SEOL, DAVIN, who is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending office action. With a total of 2 pending office actions and 2 distinct examiners, the workload is split evenly, with each examiner handling 1 matter. This distribution across 2 distinct art units ensures that the prosecution of these 2 applications is entirely independent of one another, as they do not share an examiner or a specific art unit. This lack of overlap means that the progress of a pending action is unlikely to directly influence the other based on the 2 distinct examiners involved.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (33%) |
| §103 only | 2 (67%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SEOL, DAVIN | 1 | 67.6% | +16.0% |
| RICHER, AARON M | 1 | 52.2% | +20.7% |
| WITHEY, THEODORE JOHN | 1 | 43.3% | +39.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19298464 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GENERATING A COVERAGE PATH PLANNING FOR AUTONOMOUS UNDERWATER VEHICLES | SEOL, DAVIN | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18120375 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATICALLY GENERATING SYNTHETIC HEAD VIDEOS USING A MACHINE LEARNING MODEL | WITHEY, THEODORE JOHN | 47d |
| 19298464 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GENERATING A COVERAGE PATH PLANNING FOR AUTONOMOUS UNDERWATER VEHICLES | SEOL, DAVIN | — |
| 19072246 | INTERACTIVE 3D VISUALIZATION SYSTEM FOR 3D OBJECTS AND A METHOD THEREOF | RICHER, AARON M | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3662 | 1 |
| 2611 | 1 |
| 2655 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19298464 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GENERATING A COVERAGE PATH PLANNING FOR AUTONOMOUS UNDERWATER VEHICLES | SEOL, DAVIN | 3662 | §101§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 13, 2025 |
| 19072246 | INTERACTIVE 3D VISUALIZATION SYSTEM FOR 3D OBJECTS AND A METHOD THEREOF | RICHER, AARON M | 2611 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 06, 2025 |
| 18120375 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATICALLY GENERATING SYNTHETIC HEAD VIDEOS USING A MACHINE LEARNING MODEL | WITHEY, THEODORE JOHN | 2655 | §103 | Final Rejection | 47d | Pending | Mar 11, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialInternational Institute Of Information Technology Hyderabad has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 3 examiners.
Davin Seol has the most, with 1 of International Institute Of Information Technology Hyderabad's pending office actions.
Mostly Communications (USPTO Tech Center 2600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
