Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Intratus-Nevada Inc.

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Intratus-Nevada Inc. focuses its patent portfolio on the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. The company currently has 1 pending office action under review. This prosecution activity involves 1 distinct examiner and is located within 1 distinct art unit. This indicates a very specific focus for the company's current intellectual property efforts, with all activity concentrated in a single area of the USPTO.

SIMMONS, CHRIS E is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, managing 1 pending office action. As the only examiner currently reviewing the company's work, this individual's interpretation of Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals standards is critical. For a practitioner, this means that the prosecution strategy must be specifically aligned with the expectations of SIMMONS, CHRIS E, as there are no other examiners to provide alternative perspectives.

The presence of 1 pending office action in 1 distinct art unit means that the company's current patent trajectory is highly dependent on a single set of results. There is no broader portfolio activity to mitigate the impact of a single examiner's decision. Consequently, the company's success in securing its intellectual property relies on the successful navigation of the specific requirements set forth in the 1 pending office action.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Double-patenting + other1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SIMMONS, CHRIS E 1 34.1% +19.4%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17466050 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR TREATING PRESBYOPIA, HYPEROPIA, ASTIGMATISM, DECREASED STEREOPSIS, AND DECREASED CONTRAST SENSITIVITY SIMMONS, CHRIS E —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1622 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
17466050 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR TREATING PRESBYOPIA, HYPEROPIA, ASTIGMATISM, DECREASED STEREOPSIS, AND DECREASED CONTRAST SENSITIVITY SIMMONS, CHRIS E 1622 §103DP Final Rejection — Pending Sep 03, 2021

Managing Intratus-Nevada Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month